Analysis for
wikipedia.org
FlareAI™ Summary
FlareAI™ Summary: Wikipedia.org is generally safe, scoring 82/100. A valid SSL certificate and clear privacy policy enhance trust. The absence of login/payment features reduces risk. However, a single blacklist appearance warrants monitoring. While Wikipedia itself is secure, exercise caution with external links within articles. Independently verify linked sources to avoid potential threats. Remain vigilant against phishing attempts impersonating Wikipedia. Despite the high score, critical evaluation of external links is crucial for safe browsing.
Score Breakdown
How we calculated the Flare Score based on positive and negative signals.
Positive Signals
Negative Signals
Pro Tip: A valid SSL certificate is a basic requirement for any trustworthy site, but it doesn't guarantee the site is not a scam.
SSL & Security
SSL certificate and security headers configuration
SSL Certificate
Security Headers
Domain & WHOIS Information
DNS Configuration
Domain Name System records and email security configuration
HTTP Headers
Key server response headers for security analysis.
IP Geolocation
Server location and network information
Email Configuration
Email security and authentication records (SPF, DKIM, DMARC).
Performance Metrics
Website loading speed and performance analysis
Excellent! This website loads quickly and provides a great user experience.
Blacklist Check
Checking if this domain is listed on major security blacklists.
Discovered Subdomains
Publicly accessible subdomains associated with this domain.
Privacy & Trackers
Website Screenshot
In-Depth Analysis
Wikipedia.org presents a generally trustworthy profile. Its age (9063 days) and the presence of a valid SSL certificate from Let's Encrypt indicate established legitimacy. The absence of login and payment functionalities mitigates certain risks. A FlareScore of 82/100 reflects a solid security posture.
Strengths include a clear privacy policy and the absence of trackers, demonstrating a commitment to user privacy. However, the single blacklist appearance is a concern, requiring further investigation into the nature and severity of the listing.
While Wikipedia itself doesn't directly handle sensitive user data, users should exercise caution when clicking external links within articles, as these may lead to less secure sites. Verify the legitimacy of linked sources independently.
Recommendations include monitoring the blacklist status and ensuring that any embedded content from external sources is properly vetted. Users should remain vigilant about phishing attempts that might impersonate Wikipedia. Despite the high score, vigilance and critical evaluation of external links are essential for safe browsing.
User Reviews and Complaints
Share your experience with this site or ask questions. Your comments help the community.
Sign in to Share Your Experience
Join our community to leave reviews and help others make informed decisions.
No reviews yet.